Does anyone else get tired of hearing the phrase, "ever since Martin Luther Christians have been calling for new reformations?" Are evangelicals just ignorant of church history, or are we profoundly narcissisic? We need to come to grips with the fact that there were reformers and reformations before "THE" Reformation.
The Monastic Movement:
"A majority of the monks were laymen. At first they were looked at somewhat askance by many of the officials of the Catholic Church, but before long monasticism became a recognized feature of the Catholic Church. In an age when the majority in that church were conforming less and less to Christian standards, monks represented a surge of life which endeavored in a nominally Christian but essentially non-Christian society to realize fully Christian, community living. --Kenneth Scott Latourette
St. Anthony (c. 250-356),
Basil of Caesarea and Gregory Nazianzus,
Macrina
Pachomius (c. 285 or c. 292-346),
St. Martin of Tours
Jerome (c. 342-420).
Benedict of Nursia (c. 480-c. 544).
10th century
The Cluniac Reform
Dunstan (c. 909-998).
Bernard of Menthon (923-1008),
11th century
The Bishops of Canterbury: Lanfranc and Anselm,
Bruno and the Cartesians 11th century
Bernard of Clairvaux (1090-1153),
Pope Leo IX
Peter Damien (1007-1072)
Pope Alexander II
Gregory VII (Hildebrand) (c. 1023-1085).
Urban II (c. 1088-1099)
Innocent III (reigned (1198-1216) and Fourth Lateran Council
12th century:
The Cistercian Reform
Peter of Bruys and Arnold of Brescia,
Peter Waldo and the Waldenses
Francis of Assisi (1181 or 1182 to 1226).
Clare of Assisi
Dominic (c. 1170-1221),
13th century
The Mendicant Orders of the : Franciscans and DOminicans
14th century
Catherine of Siena (1347-1380),
Girolamo Savonarola (1452-1498).
John Wyclif (c. 1320-1384).
John Hus (c. 1373-1415),
Bohemian Brethren (the Unitas Fratrum),
Geert Groote (1340 – 1384) and the Brethern of the Common Life
15th century
Jacques Lefèvre d’Ètaples (c. 1455-1536)
Desiderius Erasmus (c. 1466-1536),
Ximénes de Cisneros (1436-1517),
For more, here is a helpful article:
The Pre-Reformation Catholic Church"
also read
Kenneth Scott Latourette's "Christianity Through the Ages"
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
What do elections and human eggs have in common?
It's no surprise that a society that regards embryos as commodities should regard its elections the same way.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adam Zyglis
The Buffalo News
Oct 16, 2010
EditorialCartoonists.com
Egg Donor Program Directory
Egg Donor Programs ; Compensation
(Listed by City)
Apply online now. Click the link below nearest you.
Atlanta, GA
Atlanta Center for Reproductive Medicine
Compensation is $6,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
Northeast Assisted Fertility Group
Compensation is $10,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
Reproductive Biology Associates
Compensation is $6,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
Boston, MA
Northeast Assisted Fertility Group
Compensation is $10,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
Chicago, IL
ConceiveAbilities
Compensation is $5,000 to $10,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
Cincinnati, OH
Reproductive Assistance Inc.
Compensation is $5,000+
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
Dallas, TX
Reproductive Assistance Inc.
Compensation is $6,000+
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
Denver, CO
ConceiveAbilities
Compensation is $5,000 to $10,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
Miami, FL
Northeast Assisted Fertility Group
Compensation is $10,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
New York City, NY
The Center for Human Reproduction
Compensation is $8,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
Northeast Assisted Fertility Group
Compensation is $10,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
Reproductive Medicine Associates of NY
Compensation is $8,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
San Diego, CA
Extraordinary Conceptions
Compensation is $5,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
Stamford, CT
New England Fertility Institute
Compensation is $8,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
Washington, DC
Shady Grove Fertility Center
Compensation is $6,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adam Zyglis
The Buffalo News
Oct 16, 2010
EditorialCartoonists.com
Egg Donor Program Directory
Egg Donor Programs ; Compensation
(Listed by City)
Apply online now. Click the link below nearest you.
Atlanta, GA
Atlanta Center for Reproductive Medicine
Compensation is $6,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
Northeast Assisted Fertility Group
Compensation is $10,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
Reproductive Biology Associates
Compensation is $6,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
Boston, MA
Northeast Assisted Fertility Group
Compensation is $10,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
Chicago, IL
ConceiveAbilities
Compensation is $5,000 to $10,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
Cincinnati, OH
Reproductive Assistance Inc.
Compensation is $5,000+
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
Dallas, TX
Reproductive Assistance Inc.
Compensation is $6,000+
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
Denver, CO
ConceiveAbilities
Compensation is $5,000 to $10,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
Miami, FL
Northeast Assisted Fertility Group
Compensation is $10,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
New York City, NY
The Center for Human Reproduction
Compensation is $8,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
Northeast Assisted Fertility Group
Compensation is $10,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
Reproductive Medicine Associates of NY
Compensation is $8,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
San Diego, CA
Extraordinary Conceptions
Compensation is $5,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
Stamford, CT
New England Fertility Institute
Compensation is $8,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
Washington, DC
Shady Grove Fertility Center
Compensation is $6,000
Become an Egg Donor, Apply Here
Thursday, October 21, 2010
My father would have been 90 today
On October 20...
1740 - Maria Theresa became ruler of Austria, Hungary & Bohemia
1803 - US Senate ratifies Louisiana Purchase
1818 - 49th parallel forms as border between US & Canada
1818 - US & Britain agree to joint control of Oregon country
1820 - Spain sells part of Florida to US for $5 million
1864 - Lincoln formally establishes Thanksgiving as a natl holiday
1873 - P T Barnum Hippodrome featuring "Greatest Show on Earth," opens (NYC)
1877 - Franz Schubert's 2nd Symphony in B, premieres
1880 - Amsterdam Free University opens1883 - Max Bruch's "Kol Nidre," 1st performed
1908 - King Leopold II sells Congo to Belgium
1911 - Roald Amundsen sets out on race to South Pole
1920 - Raymond Edward Tichacek born, St. Louis Missouri.
1935 - Mao Tse Tung & his Communist forces ended their "Long March" at Yan'an, in Shaanxi China
1955 - Publication of The Return of the King, being the last part of The Lord of the Rings.
1957 - Walter Cronkite begins hosting weekly documentary
1963 - S Africa begins trial of Nelson Mandela & 8 others on conspiracy
1968 - Jacqueline Kennedy marries Aristotle Onassis
1971 - Snoop Doggy Dogg, [Calvin Broadus], rap singer born
1973 - Queen Elizabeth II opens Sydney Opera House
1984 - The Monterey Bay Aquarium opens in Monterey Bay, California.
Today would have been my father's 90th birthday.
1740 - Maria Theresa became ruler of Austria, Hungary & Bohemia
1803 - US Senate ratifies Louisiana Purchase
1818 - 49th parallel forms as border between US & Canada
1818 - US & Britain agree to joint control of Oregon country
1820 - Spain sells part of Florida to US for $5 million
1864 - Lincoln formally establishes Thanksgiving as a natl holiday
1873 - P T Barnum Hippodrome featuring "Greatest Show on Earth," opens (NYC)
1877 - Franz Schubert's 2nd Symphony in B, premieres
1880 - Amsterdam Free University opens1883 - Max Bruch's "Kol Nidre," 1st performed
1908 - King Leopold II sells Congo to Belgium
1911 - Roald Amundsen sets out on race to South Pole
1920 - Raymond Edward Tichacek born, St. Louis Missouri.
1935 - Mao Tse Tung & his Communist forces ended their "Long March" at Yan'an, in Shaanxi China
1955 - Publication of The Return of the King, being the last part of The Lord of the Rings.
1957 - Walter Cronkite begins hosting weekly documentary
1963 - S Africa begins trial of Nelson Mandela & 8 others on conspiracy
1968 - Jacqueline Kennedy marries Aristotle Onassis
1971 - Snoop Doggy Dogg, [Calvin Broadus], rap singer born
1973 - Queen Elizabeth II opens Sydney Opera House
1984 - The Monterey Bay Aquarium opens in Monterey Bay, California.
Today would have been my father's 90th birthday.
Sunday, October 17, 2010
Saturday, October 16, 2010
The Windows
by George Herbert
Lord, how can man preach thy eternal word?
He is a brittle crazy glass;
Yet in thy temple thou dost him afford
This glorious and transcendent place,
To be a window, through thy grace.
But when thou dost anneal in glass thy story,
Making thy life to shine within
The holy preachers, then the light and glory
More reverend grows, and more doth win;
Which else shows waterish, bleak, and thin.
Doctrine and life, colors and light, in one
When they combine and mingle, bring
A strong regard and awe; but speech alone
Doth vanish like a flaring thing,
And in the ear, not conscience, ring.
NOTE: Anneal is a term that means to use great heat to actually burn colors into the glass.
Lord, how can man preach thy eternal word?
He is a brittle crazy glass;
Yet in thy temple thou dost him afford
This glorious and transcendent place,
To be a window, through thy grace.
But when thou dost anneal in glass thy story,
Making thy life to shine within
The holy preachers, then the light and glory
More reverend grows, and more doth win;
Which else shows waterish, bleak, and thin.
Doctrine and life, colors and light, in one
When they combine and mingle, bring
A strong regard and awe; but speech alone
Doth vanish like a flaring thing,
And in the ear, not conscience, ring.
NOTE: Anneal is a term that means to use great heat to actually burn colors into the glass.
An extraordinary obiturary
from The Economist, Oct 7th 2010
Michael Lassen, stained-glass artist, died on September 8th, aged 61
ALMOST nothing is known of the men who built the great medieval cathedrals. A mason’s mark chiselled on a column; a game of nine-men’s-morris scratched on a stone; a gargoyle’s half-human face, of foreman or master of works, are all that remind observers of the crowds of labouring souls who raised Canterbury or Winchester, Beauvais or Cologne.
The dangers of such projects were legion. Contemporary illustrations show cathedral spires collapsing, vaults caving in, high scaffolding keeling over in a chaos of planks and poles. Casualties were expected, and were many, though the fabric accounts often could not name them. In modern times the labour is no less perilous; but in the days of health-and-safety and hard hats, accidents are rare. Hence the horror in Durham when, on September 3rd, Michael Lassen fell from a ladder as he helped to fix a new stained-glass window in the south quire aisle of the cathedral. He died some days later in hospital.
Climbing up in the south quire to look at the traceries originally, he had found them heavily fissured, like all Durham’s ancient sandstone. Blocks were missing on the exterior, and one side of the main arch was worn away almost to a skeleton, as though two or three centuries of wild north-east weather had blown through it. But all the stone had been carefully stabilised before his work began.
The window was of the Transfiguration of Christ, made by Tom Denny, and one of the largest to be installed in Durham in modern times. Mr Lassen was working from top to bottom, fixing the glass he had leaded. He started with the small quatrefoil lights of the Holy Spirit and the crucifixion, proceeding down through the main panels of Christ and his followers on the mountain, with all the way the white shaft of God’s transfiguring light growing broader through the fire-and-storm colours of the glass. The four principal lights, nicknamed after the chief figures in them, were Cuthbert, Moses, Elijah and Michael; they became familiar friends. He was fitting a small panel at the bottom left-hand side, a pane of bruised blue glass that showed the broken and suffering about to be transformed by light, almost the last piece in the window, when he fell. He was not particularly high up, working at the ledge. But stone flags are unforgiving.
Mr Lassen had been called in late to lead and fix this window. The man originally contracted had fallen ill, and the deadline for the installation, the end of September, was fast approaching. Help was needed fast; Mr Lassen provided it, expertly and fully. The tight timetable troubled him; but he was not a keen marathon runner for nothing.
His training had been traditional, in the Government School of Stained Glass at Hadamar in Germany; though English, he had spent many childhood years in Bavaria. After working as a glazer and glass-restorer, he had turned to glass-painting and designing, gradually obtaining commissions in churches all over Britain. His own windows, at St Cadoc’s chapel in Cowbridge in South Wales, or in the Church of Sts Peter and Paul at Great Somerford in Wiltshire, showed a love of blocks of pure colour carefully contained within thick, angular leads, especially glowing blues and rich reds: the medieval way of glass. His figures, too, had a medieval solidity, dignity and stillness about them.
Lead and fire
The techniques needed to lead and fix his own glass had barely changed. He would stretch the H-section lead strips, or cames, to stop “creep” in the soft, ductile metal; cut them expertly straight with his pliers, so as to leave no gaps between them when they were moulded round the glass pieces; apply the hot chisel-tip of the soldering iron just long enough to melt the solder, not the lead, when joining the strips together. The double-layered and plated technique of leading Mr Denny’s glass, with the lines almost lost in the painting, was at first new to him, and correspondingly tricky. But by the time of the Durham project he had become an enthusiast, and all was going well until he fell.
A memorial service for him was held at the foot of the window while the scaffolding still covered it. Mr Lassen, who worked from Bristol, was barely known in Durham, although he had once had a studio at Worship Farm, not far away. To most of the people who attended, extending the human crowd in the bottom panels of the window, he was just “that nice chap” who had had the accident. But when September 25th came, the day of dedication, he was remembered in a different way. The clue lay in George Herbert’s poem “The Windows” which was sung as an anthem at evensong. Man was “a brittle crazy glass”:
Yet in thy temple thou dost him afford This glorious and transcendent place To be a window, through thy grace.
As the congregation pressed through afterwards into the south quire aisle they found the windows still wreathed in incense, like the cloud of God that had enveloped Jesus on the mountain. Through it shone the glass. Its golds and blues were smoky in the evening light, but the central column blazed white, like the transfiguration of a man; and of all men, named or un-named, whose lives and skills are embedded in the stone and glass of great cathedrals.
Michael Lassen, stained-glass artist, died on September 8th, aged 61
ALMOST nothing is known of the men who built the great medieval cathedrals. A mason’s mark chiselled on a column; a game of nine-men’s-morris scratched on a stone; a gargoyle’s half-human face, of foreman or master of works, are all that remind observers of the crowds of labouring souls who raised Canterbury or Winchester, Beauvais or Cologne.
The dangers of such projects were legion. Contemporary illustrations show cathedral spires collapsing, vaults caving in, high scaffolding keeling over in a chaos of planks and poles. Casualties were expected, and were many, though the fabric accounts often could not name them. In modern times the labour is no less perilous; but in the days of health-and-safety and hard hats, accidents are rare. Hence the horror in Durham when, on September 3rd, Michael Lassen fell from a ladder as he helped to fix a new stained-glass window in the south quire aisle of the cathedral. He died some days later in hospital.
Climbing up in the south quire to look at the traceries originally, he had found them heavily fissured, like all Durham’s ancient sandstone. Blocks were missing on the exterior, and one side of the main arch was worn away almost to a skeleton, as though two or three centuries of wild north-east weather had blown through it. But all the stone had been carefully stabilised before his work began.
The window was of the Transfiguration of Christ, made by Tom Denny, and one of the largest to be installed in Durham in modern times. Mr Lassen was working from top to bottom, fixing the glass he had leaded. He started with the small quatrefoil lights of the Holy Spirit and the crucifixion, proceeding down through the main panels of Christ and his followers on the mountain, with all the way the white shaft of God’s transfiguring light growing broader through the fire-and-storm colours of the glass. The four principal lights, nicknamed after the chief figures in them, were Cuthbert, Moses, Elijah and Michael; they became familiar friends. He was fitting a small panel at the bottom left-hand side, a pane of bruised blue glass that showed the broken and suffering about to be transformed by light, almost the last piece in the window, when he fell. He was not particularly high up, working at the ledge. But stone flags are unforgiving.
Mr Lassen had been called in late to lead and fix this window. The man originally contracted had fallen ill, and the deadline for the installation, the end of September, was fast approaching. Help was needed fast; Mr Lassen provided it, expertly and fully. The tight timetable troubled him; but he was not a keen marathon runner for nothing.
His training had been traditional, in the Government School of Stained Glass at Hadamar in Germany; though English, he had spent many childhood years in Bavaria. After working as a glazer and glass-restorer, he had turned to glass-painting and designing, gradually obtaining commissions in churches all over Britain. His own windows, at St Cadoc’s chapel in Cowbridge in South Wales, or in the Church of Sts Peter and Paul at Great Somerford in Wiltshire, showed a love of blocks of pure colour carefully contained within thick, angular leads, especially glowing blues and rich reds: the medieval way of glass. His figures, too, had a medieval solidity, dignity and stillness about them.
Lead and fire
The techniques needed to lead and fix his own glass had barely changed. He would stretch the H-section lead strips, or cames, to stop “creep” in the soft, ductile metal; cut them expertly straight with his pliers, so as to leave no gaps between them when they were moulded round the glass pieces; apply the hot chisel-tip of the soldering iron just long enough to melt the solder, not the lead, when joining the strips together. The double-layered and plated technique of leading Mr Denny’s glass, with the lines almost lost in the painting, was at first new to him, and correspondingly tricky. But by the time of the Durham project he had become an enthusiast, and all was going well until he fell.
A memorial service for him was held at the foot of the window while the scaffolding still covered it. Mr Lassen, who worked from Bristol, was barely known in Durham, although he had once had a studio at Worship Farm, not far away. To most of the people who attended, extending the human crowd in the bottom panels of the window, he was just “that nice chap” who had had the accident. But when September 25th came, the day of dedication, he was remembered in a different way. The clue lay in George Herbert’s poem “The Windows” which was sung as an anthem at evensong. Man was “a brittle crazy glass”:
Yet in thy temple thou dost him afford This glorious and transcendent place To be a window, through thy grace.
As the congregation pressed through afterwards into the south quire aisle they found the windows still wreathed in incense, like the cloud of God that had enveloped Jesus on the mountain. Through it shone the glass. Its golds and blues were smoky in the evening light, but the central column blazed white, like the transfiguration of a man; and of all men, named or un-named, whose lives and skills are embedded in the stone and glass of great cathedrals.
Thursday, October 14, 2010
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
Leadership Lessons from Luis Urzua
Boss Luis Urzua and the Trapped Miners in Chile:
A Classic Case of a Leadership, Performance, and Humanity
(Psychology Today, Sept. 6, 2010)
When people ask me for one sentence summary of a great boss, I answer "He or she promotes both performance and humanity, and strikes a healthy balance between the two when trade-offs are necessary." In Good Boss, Bad Boss, I quote a cool 2008 American Psychologist article by Mark Van Vugt, Robert Hogan, and Robert Kaiser who, after examining descriptions of admired and effective leaders in settings ranging from ancient human tribes to modern corporations and sports teams, conclude the best leaders are both "competent and benevolent."
In light of this perspective, I am intrigued with reports (see here and here, for example) about 54 year-old foreman Luis Urzua and the impressive steps he is taking to oversee, organize, protect, and tend to the emotional needs of the 33 men trapped in the mine in Chile -- a group that has already been trapped for a month and faces months more. Urzua kept the men alive by immediately rationing food (two spoonfuls of tuna and a glass of milk every 48 hours for each man), which enabled them to survive and to avoid dysfunctional conflict until food started arriving through a small hole drilled be rescuers -- a crucial move because none the miners had run out of food 48 hours before despite the rationing. Uruza has organized the underground space (he is a skilled topographer) into a work area, sleeping facility, and so on, and is keeping the men on 12 hour shifts by using the headlights of trucks in the mine to simulate daylight. He not only needs to keep the group healthy and focused to survive the ordeal, he needs to stay in control because, under some rescue scenarios, the men will need to remove many tons of rocks to help with their own rescue operations.
I was also taken with reports about the "leadership team" that has emerged. The New York Times tells us that the oldest miner, 62 year-old Mario Gomez has "become the spiritual guide to his men, government officials said. He has organized a small subterranean chapel and is serving as unofficial aide to the psychologists working on the surface to cope with the miners' sadness and fear." In addition, another miner, "Yonny Barrios, 50, the group's impromptu medical monitor. He is drawing on a six-month nursing course he took about 15 years ago to administer medicines and wellness tests that health officials are sending down through the 4-inch borehole and then analyzing in a laboratory on the surface."
This case is so striking to me because Urzua and his team have taken such impressive action to tend to both the performance and human needs of the group -- the blend of their competence and compassion is striking. Moreover, if I go through the mindset of the best bosses discussed in the opening chapter of Good Boss, Bad Boss, the key elements are all there:
1. The men are being pushed by their leaders (especially Urzua) hard enough to maintain their discipline and order, but not so hard as to be overwhelmed (consistent with the notion that the best bosses strive to be perfectly assertive).
2. Uruza is showing extreme grit; in particular, a hallmark of gritty leaders is they treat life as marathon rather than a sprint,
3. In related fashion, Uruza and his team -- and their advisers above -- are treating this ordeal as a small wins situation, where the final goal of escape (and not getting overwhelmed by this big hairy goal) depends on one tiny victory after another.
4. Uruza is clearly not suffering from detachment or power poisoning, as he is hyper-aware of how the large and small things he does affect the miners' moods, actions, and ability to survive; and he is not taking more goodies for himself than others.
5. There is no doubt that he "has his people's backs," that he will do whatever is possible to protect them. One way that good leaders protect their people is by limiting outside intrusion, and you could see this mindset when he urged experts to keep the medical conference call short because "We have lots of work to do."
This is clearly an extreme situation, and you could argue that parts of it don't transfer well to the mundane organizational settings where most us work. But I do think that extreme situations sometimes bring into focus what human groups need to thrive in terms of both performance and well-being, and what the best leaders do to help make that happen. Indeed, I gleaned the five elements of the mindset of great bosses -- being just assertive enough, grit, small wins, avoiding power poisoning (and being aware that followers are watching the boss very closely), having people's backs largely from research and cases in ordinary and mundane settings.
P.S. For a take on how the miners can best survive this ordeal, check out this New York Times piece by psychiatrist Nick Kanas.
A Classic Case of a Leadership, Performance, and Humanity
(Psychology Today, Sept. 6, 2010)
When people ask me for one sentence summary of a great boss, I answer "He or she promotes both performance and humanity, and strikes a healthy balance between the two when trade-offs are necessary." In Good Boss, Bad Boss, I quote a cool 2008 American Psychologist article by Mark Van Vugt, Robert Hogan, and Robert Kaiser who, after examining descriptions of admired and effective leaders in settings ranging from ancient human tribes to modern corporations and sports teams, conclude the best leaders are both "competent and benevolent."
In light of this perspective, I am intrigued with reports (see here and here, for example) about 54 year-old foreman Luis Urzua and the impressive steps he is taking to oversee, organize, protect, and tend to the emotional needs of the 33 men trapped in the mine in Chile -- a group that has already been trapped for a month and faces months more. Urzua kept the men alive by immediately rationing food (two spoonfuls of tuna and a glass of milk every 48 hours for each man), which enabled them to survive and to avoid dysfunctional conflict until food started arriving through a small hole drilled be rescuers -- a crucial move because none the miners had run out of food 48 hours before despite the rationing. Uruza has organized the underground space (he is a skilled topographer) into a work area, sleeping facility, and so on, and is keeping the men on 12 hour shifts by using the headlights of trucks in the mine to simulate daylight. He not only needs to keep the group healthy and focused to survive the ordeal, he needs to stay in control because, under some rescue scenarios, the men will need to remove many tons of rocks to help with their own rescue operations.
I was also taken with reports about the "leadership team" that has emerged. The New York Times tells us that the oldest miner, 62 year-old Mario Gomez has "become the spiritual guide to his men, government officials said. He has organized a small subterranean chapel and is serving as unofficial aide to the psychologists working on the surface to cope with the miners' sadness and fear." In addition, another miner, "Yonny Barrios, 50, the group's impromptu medical monitor. He is drawing on a six-month nursing course he took about 15 years ago to administer medicines and wellness tests that health officials are sending down through the 4-inch borehole and then analyzing in a laboratory on the surface."
This case is so striking to me because Urzua and his team have taken such impressive action to tend to both the performance and human needs of the group -- the blend of their competence and compassion is striking. Moreover, if I go through the mindset of the best bosses discussed in the opening chapter of Good Boss, Bad Boss, the key elements are all there:
1. The men are being pushed by their leaders (especially Urzua) hard enough to maintain their discipline and order, but not so hard as to be overwhelmed (consistent with the notion that the best bosses strive to be perfectly assertive).
2. Uruza is showing extreme grit; in particular, a hallmark of gritty leaders is they treat life as marathon rather than a sprint,
3. In related fashion, Uruza and his team -- and their advisers above -- are treating this ordeal as a small wins situation, where the final goal of escape (and not getting overwhelmed by this big hairy goal) depends on one tiny victory after another.
4. Uruza is clearly not suffering from detachment or power poisoning, as he is hyper-aware of how the large and small things he does affect the miners' moods, actions, and ability to survive; and he is not taking more goodies for himself than others.
5. There is no doubt that he "has his people's backs," that he will do whatever is possible to protect them. One way that good leaders protect their people is by limiting outside intrusion, and you could see this mindset when he urged experts to keep the medical conference call short because "We have lots of work to do."
This is clearly an extreme situation, and you could argue that parts of it don't transfer well to the mundane organizational settings where most us work. But I do think that extreme situations sometimes bring into focus what human groups need to thrive in terms of both performance and well-being, and what the best leaders do to help make that happen. Indeed, I gleaned the five elements of the mindset of great bosses -- being just assertive enough, grit, small wins, avoiding power poisoning (and being aware that followers are watching the boss very closely), having people's backs largely from research and cases in ordinary and mundane settings.
P.S. For a take on how the miners can best survive this ordeal, check out this New York Times piece by psychiatrist Nick Kanas.
J. Budziszewski on Marriage: "Covenant," or "Covenant Plus?"
I am teaching a unit on the Middle Ages for my "Western Thought and Art" course, and at the same time I have been talking with someone about marriage. Many evangelicals reflexively reject the idea of sacrament, and so (in my opinion) come to class and to relationships with the opposite sex considerably impaired. In his article for Boundless Magazine (a publication from Focus on the Family!) J. Budziszewski gives a thoughtful explanation of "covenant" and "sacrament," and discussses their significance for marriage:
"...We need to get two things straight right away. The first is that you can't settle the disagreement between sacramentalists and non sacramentalists by checking to see whether your translation of the Bible uses the word "sacrament." Some do, some don't. The important thing isn't whether the word is there but whether the concept is there.
Take what Paul says about marriage in Ephesians 5:32. The Revised Standard Version translates it, "This mystery is profound, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church." The Douay-Rheims, which is based on the Latin, translates it "This is a great sacrament; but I speak in Christ and in the church." What's going on? Paul was using the Greek word mysterion, from which we get the everyday English word "mystery." But the Vulgate, an important Latin version of the New Testament, translates mysterion as sacramentum, from which we get the English theological word "sacrament." Which English term you prefer depends on just what kind of dynamite charge you think that potent word mysterion is carrying. Apparently a deep and holy secret is hidden in marriage but hidden in what sense? I'll come back to that question, but for now let's set it aside.
The second thing to get straight is that it's a bit misleading to characterize the issue as "covenant vs. sacrament." Actually, both sides view marriage as covenant. Covenant is easy to explain. A covenant is a solemn and binding commitment among at least two parties, expressed in a promise to do something (or not to do something). Some covenants are unilateral, like the covenant between God and Abraham. Abraham didn't promise anything; he merely had to accept God's promise to make of his descendants a great nation set apart for Himself. Other covenants are mutual, like the covenant of God with the Israelites at Mt. Sinai. He promised to be their God, and they promised to follow Him and be His people. Which kind of covenant is marriage? The answer: A mutual covenant between the man and the woman, in which they give themselves to each other as husband and wife.
So far all Christians agree. However, one side views marriage as covenant only and the other side the sacramentalist side views it as covenant plus. The plus takes longer to explain, and I need to take several steps back. First let's talk about what might be called the sacramental view of the world, then let's talk about the definition of a sacrament. Only after that will I return to the sacrament of marriage.
In the beginning God created each material thing, pronouncing His work good. He took the greatest care with us, breathing the breath of life into mere dust to make a being that had a body like the animals, had a spirit like the angels, and bore His image. In the Incarnation He went still further, taking on our own bodily nature yet also remaining fully God. Sacramentalists reflect that if all these things are true, then God must be perfectly comfortable with matter, and must be able to use it for His own spiritual purposes.
It seems to them that this is exactly how God does use matter. Take baptism, for example. To sacramentalists, passing through the baptismal waters isn't just a symbol of spiritual birth, any more than passing through the birth waters is just a symbol of physical birth; it is the very way in which God makes the event happen, the outward and visible means by which He brings about the inward, invisible, spiritual grace.
The term "sacraments" is a general term that sacramentalists use for created things that God chooses to use like that. They are symbols, but according to sacramentalists (here non sacramentalists disagree) they are more than symbols too. The waters of baptism symbolize second birth, the bread and wine of holy communion symbolize the body and blood of Christ but that is not all that they do. By His grace, sacramentalists believe, they actually bring about the things that they symbolize. Baptism imparts second birth; holy communion makes the body and blood of Christ really present.
So where does marriage come in? Sacramentalists view marriage as another sacrament, another symbol plus. The symbol the outward and visible sign is the covenant itself: the free and mutual consent of the man and the woman to give themselves to each other as husband and wife, expressed through words in the presence of the Church. The plus the inward, invisible, spiritual event that God uses this covenant to bring about is that the two are made really and permanently one, receiving the grace to love each other with the very same love with which Christ has loved His Church.
Sacramentalists say that this is what Paul was talking about in Ephesians 5:29-32 when he spoke of the "mystery" of marriage, for it does hide something secret and mysterious. An amazing but invisible grace is hidden behind the visible act of exchanging vows. If this grace is real, it really matters. Suppose you were chatting with a friend who said, "The ceremony of exchanging vows is just a formality. My girlfriend and I were married in our hearts as soon as we moved in together." If you were a sacramentalist, you'd reply, "No, it's more than a formality. At the moment you exchange your vows, and not before, God pours the grace of matrimony through the gateway that your vows have opened up."
The sacramental view of Christian marriage is very ancient. Disagreement arose chiefly at the time of the Reformation. Catholics have always held strong views of the sacraments, as some Protestants still do too. Other Protestants hold weaker sacramental views, and still others reject sacramentalism completely. Clouding the picture is that a lot of people hold more or less sacramental views without knowing it.
Here is one way to think about the disagreement. There are two opposite mistakes to be avoided about the relation between God and His creation; the great thing is to avoid them both. At one extreme is idolatry, which overrates created things, confusing them with God Himself. At the other is gnosticism, which considers matter evil and only spirit good, denying that the good God made them both. Non-sacramentalists think sacramentalists come perilously close to idolatry, worshipping created things in place of God. Sacramentalists hate idolatry too, but they think non-sacramentalists cross over into gnosticism, despising God's creation and limiting His power to use material things for spiritual purposes. The question is: Which fear is reasonable, and which is misplaced?
These are serious disagreements, and Christians should ponder them long and deeply. However, Roberto Rivera's article in Boundless didn't argue one side against the other. His emphasis wasn't on how covenant-only and covenant-plus Christians differ, but on what they have in common. These views of marriage are closer to each other than either view is to what the secular culture believes. Let us keep talking together. Maybe we can share the work of protecting precious things like the union of husband and wife.
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
Sunday, October 10, 2010
The Simpsons Just Stuck it to Fox
Groening the Gadfly...but we know what happens to gadflies, don't we.
Phillipa Foote: 1920-2010
A founder of Oxfam, Foot caused 20th century Anglo-American philosophers to reconsider Aristotelian virtue ethics, a feat no less stunning than if Glenn Beck were to become a Trappist monk. Read her obiturary here.
Saturday, October 09, 2010
There's a sermon here...
"I'm happy because it means my son is going to be born again and I'm going to look after him 24 hours a day, because he deserves it." --Alicia Campos, the mother of Daniel Herrera, one of the trapped Chilean miners
Cries of joy as drill reaches trapped Chile miners
By Gideon Long
BBC News, San Jose mine, Chile
On Saturday, one of the three drills being used to reach them punctured through to an area known as the workshop, an underground chamber that the miners can access. The news triggered celebrations at Camp Hope, the ever-expanding makeshift camp that has been home to some of the miners' relatives for more than two months.
At shortly after 0800 local time (1200 GMT), cries of joy could be heard from the tents where the miners' families were sheltering. They had heard the news. A bell was rung and, in the morning mist, a few relatives scrambled up a barren hillside overlooking the site to chant and wave red, white and blue Chilean flags.
"I'm happy, I'm happy, because it means that Mother Earth is going to give our loved ones back to us," said Alicia Campos, the mother of Daniel Herrera, one of the trapped men. "I'm happy because it means my son is going to be born again and I'm going to look after him 24 hours a day, because he deserves it." "It's been a long wait but we're already starting to forget about that wait."
Moments later, the Chilean Mining Minister, Laurence Golborne, strode down from the mine to talk to reporters, and he highlighted the symbolism of the moment."It's very curious that we are having 33 days of drilling for the rescue of 33 souls," he said.
Safety checks
What happens next depends on the engineers.The miners should be rescued within the next two to eight days They will inspect the walls of the escape shaft to test the quality of the rock.On the basis of that assessment, they will decide whether to clad the walls of the tunnel with a metal sleeve, or leave them bare.That decision will determine the timetable for the rescue. Mr Golborne has said it will take place sometime within the next two to eight days. Once the tunnel is secured, the rescue team will set up a winch at the top of it and lower a specially designed escape capsule down to the miners.Only then will the men be brought up to the surface.
A group of medics will be waiting to meet them. The men will be given preliminary first aid at the site, will be reunited with a few of their relatives and will then be flown by helicopter to the nearby city of Copiapo. They will be kept in hospital for two days and only then will they be allowed home.
Cries of joy as drill reaches trapped Chile miners
By Gideon Long
BBC News, San Jose mine, Chile
On Saturday, one of the three drills being used to reach them punctured through to an area known as the workshop, an underground chamber that the miners can access. The news triggered celebrations at Camp Hope, the ever-expanding makeshift camp that has been home to some of the miners' relatives for more than two months.
At shortly after 0800 local time (1200 GMT), cries of joy could be heard from the tents where the miners' families were sheltering. They had heard the news. A bell was rung and, in the morning mist, a few relatives scrambled up a barren hillside overlooking the site to chant and wave red, white and blue Chilean flags.
"I'm happy, I'm happy, because it means that Mother Earth is going to give our loved ones back to us," said Alicia Campos, the mother of Daniel Herrera, one of the trapped men. "I'm happy because it means my son is going to be born again and I'm going to look after him 24 hours a day, because he deserves it." "It's been a long wait but we're already starting to forget about that wait."
Moments later, the Chilean Mining Minister, Laurence Golborne, strode down from the mine to talk to reporters, and he highlighted the symbolism of the moment."It's very curious that we are having 33 days of drilling for the rescue of 33 souls," he said.
Safety checks
What happens next depends on the engineers.The miners should be rescued within the next two to eight days They will inspect the walls of the escape shaft to test the quality of the rock.On the basis of that assessment, they will decide whether to clad the walls of the tunnel with a metal sleeve, or leave them bare.That decision will determine the timetable for the rescue. Mr Golborne has said it will take place sometime within the next two to eight days. Once the tunnel is secured, the rescue team will set up a winch at the top of it and lower a specially designed escape capsule down to the miners.Only then will the men be brought up to the surface.
A group of medics will be waiting to meet them. The men will be given preliminary first aid at the site, will be reunited with a few of their relatives and will then be flown by helicopter to the nearby city of Copiapo. They will be kept in hospital for two days and only then will they be allowed home.
Thursday, October 07, 2010
Is this a joke? Apparently not!
Worship This Wee
By Ardie Arvidson
Published: October 07, 2010
Women’s Baptist Pee Dee District Department of the Pee Dee Baptist Association Fall Summit: Saturday at Round O Baptist Church, 1900 Society Hill Road in Darlington. Registration at 9:45 a.m., Workshop: The Witness Project at 10 a.m. The Rev. Michael McMillan is pastor, and Ophelia Bloodworth is missionary president.
Yes, that's the headline. "Wee," not "week," and Pee, Dee and "O."
Even more confounding: Why does the Pee Dee Baptist Association have large picture of St. Peter's Basilica at its masthead?
By Ardie Arvidson
Published: October 07, 2010
Women’s Baptist Pee Dee District Department of the Pee Dee Baptist Association Fall Summit: Saturday at Round O Baptist Church, 1900 Society Hill Road in Darlington. Registration at 9:45 a.m., Workshop: The Witness Project at 10 a.m. The Rev. Michael McMillan is pastor, and Ophelia Bloodworth is missionary president.
Yes, that's the headline. "Wee," not "week," and Pee, Dee and "O."
Even more confounding: Why does the Pee Dee Baptist Association have large picture of St. Peter's Basilica at its masthead?
Wednesday, October 06, 2010
A Covenant for Civility
Come Let Us Reason Together
How good and pleasant it is when the people of God live together in unity.—Psalm 133:1
As Christian pastors and leaders with diverse theological and political beliefs, we have come together to make this covenant with each other, and to commend it to the church, faith-based organizations, and individuals, so that together we can contribute to a more civil national discourse. The church in the United States can offer a message of hope and reconciliation to a nation that is deeply divided by political and cultural differences. Too often, however, we have reflected the political divisions of our culture rather than the unity we have in the body of Christ. We come together to urge those who claim the name of Christ to “ put away from you all bitterness and wrath and anger and wrangling and slander, together with all malice, and be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ has forgiven you” (Ephesians 4:31-32).
1) We commit that our dialogue with each other will reflect the spirit of the Scriptures, where our posture toward each other is to be “quick to listen, slow to speak and slow to become angry” (James 1:19).
2) We believe that each of us, and our fellow human beings, are created in the image of God. The respect we owe to God should be reflected in the honor and respect we show to each other in our common humanity, particularly in how we speak to each other. “With the tongue we bless the Lord and Father, and with it we curse those who are made in the likeness of God …. this ought not to be so” (James 3:9, 10).
3) We pledge that when we disagree, we will do so respectfully, without falsely impugning the other’s motives, attacking the other’s character, or questioning the other’s faith, and recognizing in humility that in our limited, human opinions, “we see but a poor reflection as in a mirror” (1 Corinthians 13:12). We will therefore “be completely humble and gentle; be patient, bearing with one another in love” (Ephesians 4:2).
4) We will ever be mindful of the language we use in expressing our disagreements, being neither arrogant nor boastful in our beliefs: “Before destruction one’s heart is haughty, but humility goes before honor” (Proverbs 18:12).
5) We recognize that we cannot function together as citizens of the same community, whether local or national, unless we are mindful of how we treat each other in pursuit of the common good in the common life we share together. Each of us must therefore “put off falsehood and speak truthfully to his neighbor, for we are all members of one body” (Ephesians 4:25).
6) We commit to pray for our political leaders—those with whom we may agree, as well as those with whom we may disagree. “I urge that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made … for kings and all who are in high positions” (1 Timothy 2:1-2).
7) We believe that it is more difficult to hate others, even our adversaries and our enemies, when we are praying for them. We commit to pray for each other, those with whom we agree and those with whom we may disagree, so that together we may strive to be faithful witnesses to our Lord, who prayed “ that they may be one” (John 17:22).
We pledge to God and to each other that we will lead by example in a country where civil discourse seems to have broken down. We will work to model a better way in how we treat each other in our many faith communities, even across religious and political lines. We will strive to create in our congregations safe and sacred spaces for common prayer and community discussion as we come together to seek God’s will for our nation and our world.
See who's signed this, and consider signing it for yourself here . I wish I could see the Evangelical Covenant as listed among the main signatories.
Finally, In the spirit of the Civility Covenant, lets pray for these brothers and sisters.
How good and pleasant it is when the people of God live together in unity.—Psalm 133:1
As Christian pastors and leaders with diverse theological and political beliefs, we have come together to make this covenant with each other, and to commend it to the church, faith-based organizations, and individuals, so that together we can contribute to a more civil national discourse. The church in the United States can offer a message of hope and reconciliation to a nation that is deeply divided by political and cultural differences. Too often, however, we have reflected the political divisions of our culture rather than the unity we have in the body of Christ. We come together to urge those who claim the name of Christ to “ put away from you all bitterness and wrath and anger and wrangling and slander, together with all malice, and be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ has forgiven you” (Ephesians 4:31-32).
1) We commit that our dialogue with each other will reflect the spirit of the Scriptures, where our posture toward each other is to be “quick to listen, slow to speak and slow to become angry” (James 1:19).
2) We believe that each of us, and our fellow human beings, are created in the image of God. The respect we owe to God should be reflected in the honor and respect we show to each other in our common humanity, particularly in how we speak to each other. “With the tongue we bless the Lord and Father, and with it we curse those who are made in the likeness of God …. this ought not to be so” (James 3:9, 10).
3) We pledge that when we disagree, we will do so respectfully, without falsely impugning the other’s motives, attacking the other’s character, or questioning the other’s faith, and recognizing in humility that in our limited, human opinions, “we see but a poor reflection as in a mirror” (1 Corinthians 13:12). We will therefore “be completely humble and gentle; be patient, bearing with one another in love” (Ephesians 4:2).
4) We will ever be mindful of the language we use in expressing our disagreements, being neither arrogant nor boastful in our beliefs: “Before destruction one’s heart is haughty, but humility goes before honor” (Proverbs 18:12).
5) We recognize that we cannot function together as citizens of the same community, whether local or national, unless we are mindful of how we treat each other in pursuit of the common good in the common life we share together. Each of us must therefore “put off falsehood and speak truthfully to his neighbor, for we are all members of one body” (Ephesians 4:25).
6) We commit to pray for our political leaders—those with whom we may agree, as well as those with whom we may disagree. “I urge that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made … for kings and all who are in high positions” (1 Timothy 2:1-2).
7) We believe that it is more difficult to hate others, even our adversaries and our enemies, when we are praying for them. We commit to pray for each other, those with whom we agree and those with whom we may disagree, so that together we may strive to be faithful witnesses to our Lord, who prayed “ that they may be one” (John 17:22).
We pledge to God and to each other that we will lead by example in a country where civil discourse seems to have broken down. We will work to model a better way in how we treat each other in our many faith communities, even across religious and political lines. We will strive to create in our congregations safe and sacred spaces for common prayer and community discussion as we come together to seek God’s will for our nation and our world.
See who's signed this, and consider signing it for yourself here . I wish I could see the Evangelical Covenant as listed among the main signatories.
Finally, In the spirit of the Civility Covenant, lets pray for these brothers and sisters.
"Babies:" The documentary
I watched "Babies" last week. It was fantastic!
The opening scene of the Namibian baby is so universal. How many times has it been repeated, across cultures, across time?
Poor little Japanese baby lives in a tiny, closed apartment, so confined. No wonder she has a tantrum!
San Francisco baby is typical yuppie child.
I fell in love with the Mongolian baby. He lives in a yurt and his family has roosters, goats, and cows which freely wander about. He is born in a hospital but his parents bring him home on a motorcycle. They swaddle him tightly, even tying two cords around him so he can't move. But as he grows, he gradually is "freed." He eventually crawls all around in the grass--even underfoot of the cattle, but they are careful not to step on him!
It plays like a scene from the Peacable Kingdom.
Here's a great blog entry every new mother should read:
Five Things a Mom Learned not to Stress About after watching "Babies"
Sunday, October 03, 2010
Separation of Corporation and State: Why we need a 28th Amendment
“Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power” -Benito Mussolini (Italian dictator, 1883-1945)
The first amendment has been highjacked by corporations and the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court's decision for Citizens United v. Federal Election Comission had the effect of declaring corporations to be persons in a deep and far-reaching way, so that the line between artificial, legal fictions and natural, real persons has been completely blurred.
What did the Court decide in Citizens United?
What does the decision mean for the average American?
Does the Constitution require the result in Citizens United?
What is a corporation anyway? Isn’t it like any other association of people?
How did the Citizens United case happen?
What can people do?
If Corporations are truly persons in America, that means they are citizens:
- Citizens have a responsibility to vote. Citizens cannot vote unless they register. How many votes would a corporation get? And how would corporate voter registration be handled, exactly?
- Citizens have a responsiblity to serve on juries. How will that work, now that corporations are persons, and therefore citizens?
- Citizens have a responsbility to serve and defend their country when required, but I'm having a hard time imagining Corporation X donning military gear and going off to fight in Afghanistan.
- Citizens of the U.S. have the right to run for office. Won't that be interesting! Can't you just see it? "Vote for British Petroleum for President!"
Mike Lillis wonders about this and suggests a possible scenario:
"One prominent example is CITGO Petroleum Company — once the American-born Cities Services Company, but purchased in 1990 by the Venezuelan government-owned Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. The Citizens United ruling could conceivably allow Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, who has sharply criticized both of the past two U.S. presidents, to spend government funds to defeat an American political candidate, just by having CITGO buy TV ads bashing his target."
We need to seriously consider the separation of Corporation and State, for the sake of both, and especially for the sake of human beings.
Saturday, October 02, 2010
Olson on Contradictions and Calvinism

via Brad: Roger Olson has an excellent discussion of mystery, paradox and contradiction here.
"A mystery is one thing; a paradox is a closely related thing; a logical contradiction is something else entirely. Here I agree entirely with Reformed theologian R. C. Sproul (Chosen by God, pp. 46-47). God is transcendent and therefore will always be mysterious to us. Mystery results in paradox because God is transcendent and we are finite and fallen. But contradiction is something even God cannot embrace because to embrace it is to fall into complete incoherence and unintelligibility...."
Olson then goes on to discuss a contradiction he sees in Calvinist theologies:
"...Now, to the point. Do some theological systems include contradictions? I believe so. They are almost always unrecognized and/or unadmitted. Sometimes they have to be ferreted out by careful examination and argumentation. When it can be shown conclusively that two elements of a system actually do contradict each other the system must change to accommodate that. And I cannot embrace a system that contains unresolved and unresolvable logical contradictions. (I may agree with parts of such a system, but I cannot swallow it whole.)
If even one logical contradiction can be identified at the heart of a theological system that is a fatal flaw for the system itself. At that point the system must be radically revised or given up and replaced with a different system.
I have identified here and elsewhere what I believe to be a fatal flaw in SOME Calvinist systems of belief. That is, insofar as a person believes that God foreordains and renders certain everything without exception FOR HIS GLORY and also believes that heresy (for example) diminishes or reduces God’s glory by robbing God of some of his glory he falls into contradiction. Both beliefs cannot be held at the same time. It is not a case of ordinary paradox–apparent contradiction. It is a case of sheer, unresolved and probably unresolvable logical contradiction. That is why, I believe, no Calvinist has ever risen to my challenge to explain it.
Every Calvinist that I know (and I don’t know them all) says that some beliefs (e.g., panentheism) detract from God’s glory and that is why we must oppose them with all our (persuasive) might. They diminish and detract from God’s glory. They dishonor God. They rob him of glory. Every Calvinist I know also says (usually elsewhere in his or her book or article or sermon or whatever) that God foreordains everything without exception FOR HIS GLORY.
Now some Calvinists might take the approach that panentheism (for example) does not really, ontically rob God of glory as that is impossible for any creature to do, but it diminishes recognition and acknowledgement of God’s glory in the minds of its believers. But, so what? God foreordained that also-for his glory. That a panentheist is a panentheist was foreordained and rendered certain by God for his glory (according to the Calvinists I know).
It also won’t work to say that God foreordained panentheism so that he could overcome it and by revealing it as false glorify himself. Even then, the existence of panentheism, if determined by God to redound to his glory when he overcomes it, in the meantime glorifies God insofar as it is decided by God as the means to that end.
For the life of me I cannot figure out why Calvinists of my acquaintance do not see this as a sheer logical contradiction and move to resolve it. I have asked many about this issue and they have always just looked at me as if they never thought of it or they rely on some version of an answer I just mentioned above which are no answers at all.
All that is to say, one reason I am not a Calvinist is that to be one I would have to sacrifice my intellect IN THE STRONG SENSE of embrace sheer logical incoherence and unintelligibility. NOT IN THE SENSE of embrace mystery with which I have no absolute problem. I believe this is a fatal flaw in so-called “consistent Calvinism” (which, in light of this flaw, is really “inconsistent, consistent Calvinism!).
Many contemporary Reformed theologians have moved away from decretal theology, divine determinism, and I think that has something to do with this issue. Certainly it has also to do with another possibly fatal flaw in traditional Calvinism about which I’ll write more later."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)















