Thursday, November 23, 2006

My e-mail read on Talk of the Nation!


Today while mopping the kitchen floor in preparation for Thanksgiving, I was listening to NPR. They had a discussion entitled "Calming Traffic by Losing the Signs." On the heel of an incident yesterday in the Winco parking lot, it occured to me that this "experiment in civil engineering" already takes place in every parking lot in America. So I wrote in, and Neil Conen actually read my message!

Legal Affairs:
Calming Traffic by Losing the Signs

Talk of the Nation, November 23, 2006 : Traffic engineer Ian Lockwood explains why some European cities have ditched their traffic signs and make the roads "shared space."

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6530252

Sunday, November 19, 2006

For the Aymara, the Future is "Then"


Here's a quick and dirty way of describing the difference between the premodern and modern/postmodern worldviews:

According to Ken Olson, for one South American tribe, the future is behind you, the past is in front of you. This is a distinctly teleological understanding of the world: premodernism in a nutshell. We do not lead the way, but follow in a shared pilgrimage toward some End. This is the path of faith and reason within the bounds of religion: it is the way of the Church.

The Enlightenment reversed the story, so that it is now second nature to speak of the future laying ahead of us, and the past behind us. Where there is no agreed-upon goal, anyone can press to the front of the line by dint of wit or muscle, while others are left to follow in their wake. It is up to the Leader to determine the direction, so that it becomes at best an expedition and at worst a death march. This is the path of rhetoric and unbridled reason. It is the way of the State.


Weekend Edition Saturday, August 12, 2006 ·

Most cultures see the future as something ahead. The past is behind. The Aymara of the Andean highlands reverse the perspective, and they're not alone. Ken Olson, a linguistics professor at the University of North Dakota, fills Scott Simon in on the details.

Someone might protest: this is too pessimistic! Why can't the Enlightenment be read as a pilgrimage toward an End, which is the truth of life, liberty and happiness? But to do this,

1) you cannot reject the premodern notion of an end, and so are dependent upon a concept beyond the bounds of (or even contradicting ) modernist thought; and

2) You must face the fact that modernist autonomy dictates that each individual should be free to dictate his/her own End, which may or may not be life, liberty and happiness, for that individual or for the group. Indeed, the Truth is much more than just life, liberty and happiness.

3) Finally, history shows that human leaders alone are not up to the tasks of creating heavenly cities on earth. The French and the Russian Revolutions stand as stark reminders of what happens when the past is seen as something to be overcome.

But perhaps I am being too harsh. T.S.Eliot's verse, "Little Gidding," from his Four Quartets affirms how Christ stands at the start and end of all our wanderings, and that ultimately, what matters is Him, not us. Pilgrims and genuine explorers: both will find rest with Him who is the Alpha and Omega.

"With the drawing of this Love and the voice of this
Calling

We shall not cease from exploration
And the end of all our exploring
Will be to arrive where we started
And know the place for the first time.
Through the unknown, unremembered gate
When the last of earth left to discover
Is that which was the beginning;
At the source of the longest river
The voice of the hidden waterfall
And the children in the apple-tree
Not known, because not looked for
But heard, half-heard, in the stillness
Between two waves of the sea.
Quick now, here, now, always—
A condition of complete simplicity
(Costing not less than everything)
And all shall be well and
All manner of thing shall be well
When the tongues of flame are in-folded
Into the crowned knot of fire
And the fire and the rose are one."



Friday, November 17, 2006

Message to a student after a class:



Hi -----,

To follow up on your question yesterday in PHL407, "History and Philosophy of the Enlightenment" (if you are serious about pursuing it... )

1) Read this article, and other works by N.T. Wright, an Anglican theologian.
http://www.ntwrightpage.com/Wright_Jesus_Resurrection.htm

lots more at http://www.ntwrightpage.com/

2) read this article, "The Corrected Jesus," by Richard Hays, professor of NT theology at Duke University: http://www.firstthings.com/ftissues/ft9405/articles/revessay.html

It's pretty irreverent, but that will make it all the more enjoyable for you.

3) Read
The Historical Christ and the Jesus of Faith: The Incarnational Narrative as History (Paperback)
by C. Stephen Evans "

http://www.amazon.com/Historical-Christ-Jesus-Faith-Incarnational/dp/019826397X/sr=8-1/qid=1163791939/ref=sr_1_1/104-5583102-2155936?ie=UTF8&s=books

Book Description
The story of Jesus of Nazareth, as recounted in the New Testament, has always been understood by the church to be historically true. It is an account of the life, death, and resurrection of a real person, whose links with history are firmly signalled in the creeds of the early church, which affirm that Jesus `suffered under Pontius Pilate'. Contemporary historical scholarship has, however, called into question the reliability of the church's version of this story, and thereby raised the question as to whether ordinary people can know its historical truth. This book argues that the historicity of the story still matters, and that its religious significance cannot be captured by the category of `non-historical myth'. The commonly drawn distinction between the Christ of faith and Jesus of history cannot be maintained. The Christ who is the object of faith must be seen as historical; the Jesus who is reconstructed by historical scholarship is always shaped by commitments of faith. A reconsideration of the Englightenment epistemologies that underlie much historical scholarship shows that historical knowledge of this story is still possible. Such knowledge can be inferential, based on historical evidence. A careful look at contemporary New Testament studies, and the philosophical and literary assumptions upon which it rests, shows that this scholarship should not undermine the confidence of lay people who believe that they can know that the church's story about Jesus is true.

Product Details
Paperback: 400 pages
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA (May 9, 1996)
ISBN: 019826397X

IF you want to approach this issue not from the point of view of a theologian, but of a philosopher, this is the book for you. I find it fascinating that in our day it is the philosophers who are upholding the historical truth of the gospels, and the theologians who are denying it!

4) Read:

The Meaning of Jesus: Two Visions. By Marcus J. Borg and N. T. Wright. HarperSanFrancisco. 288 pp. $24.

Contained herein is a fascinating conversation, carried out in essay form, between what might be called the two reasonable poles of historical research on the person of Jesus. Wright represents the pole which claims that historical accuracy about Jesus can be grasped only through the premises of faith and theology; Borg, at the other end, is convinced that historical testimony is valid only insofar as it can be cleansed of distorting confessions of postEaster faith. It is difficult to imagine a book that lays out more carefully, calmly, and rationally the basic disputes in Jesus research today than this thorough and accessible scholarly exchange.


-----------------------------------------------------
By now it is obvious to you that I do not share the Enlightenment presuppositions that many theologians are still working with. In order to answer Jesus' question, "Who do you say I am?" in a mature manner, I cannot see how anyone can avoid thinking about their metaphysical and epistemological commitments. One of the (few) good things about postmodernism is that it forces us to address those issues.

By my lights, it takes about a century for the ideas of the philosophers to filter down to the theologians. If that is indeed true, it will be interesting to see what the next century of biblical scholarship looks like. I predict that postmodernism will challenge the once-monolithic enterprise of the historical-critical method. Of course, it will also challenge traditional Christian orthodoxy. What will not change is the question, "who do you say I am?" (Matt. 16:15-17).

Blessings in Him,

Beth

Quote for the Day


Nothing is too wonderful to be true. -- Michael Faraday

Saturday, November 11, 2006

Susan in Oxford, November 2006



In less than a month I will be with Susan in Oxford! She is celebrating the good news that SPU will extend her scholarship to cover the cost of the next semester there, so she can return after Christmas!